Template talk:Table of contents

From OpenTTD
Jump to: navigation, search


Kudos to you

While I was critical of the Table of contents as a separate page, this idea I very much like! Very good! It'll help to make all pages that are explicitly marked s part of the manual stand out, and provide pointers to the rest of the manual. Kander 22:45, 1 May 2007 (CEST)

Indeed, a very good idea. (A bit obvious, perhaps, but useful nonetheless. ;) Jupix 17:32, 2 May 2007 (CEST)

Tramway Construction

I've added Tramway Construction directly below Roads, as it is really a sub-transport method of this. Hope nobody minds. ;) Born Acorn 18:18, 27 May 2007 (CEST)


What is wrong with <br>? Wiki's new line adds more vertical space. I think the ToC looked much better with <br>s. Zojj 02:25, 31 May 2007 (CEST)

It just looks un wiki-like. The template is better with :s instead of &nbsp;s. It's like adding a table in HTML instead of wiki syntax. I notice the <br/>s have been removed, good. Bruce98 14:14, 31 May 2007 (CEST)
I was thinking along the same lines, just couldn't express myself very well. -- Jokes Free4Me 17:04, 31 May 2007 (CEST)
Page appearance is more important than code. Which one do yall think looks better? I'm still partial to the left. =) Zojj 22:32, 31 May 2007 (CEST)

Game Interface

    Railway Construction
    Roadway construction
    Dock Construction
    Airport Construction

    Road Vehicles

I'd say right. Bruce98 22:41, 31 May 2007 (CEST)
I'd prefer the left one, because it looks nicer (well I cannot say the same about the code that it needs, but still) :P Well in the end it doesn't matter as both fulfill the requirements. It should just be unique overall the wiki, imho. Sleepie 00:10, 1 June 2007 (CEST)
I don't really care about either, so i would abstain in a vote on this; even though some might say that the left one seems a bit crowded, when there doesn't really matter how high the div will be... ;-) -- Jokes Free4Me 04:33, 1 June 2007 (CEST)
Count me in for the left one. It's just more compact; 50 kb and code esthetics isn't really a big deal. -- H3llkn0wz 10:30, 1 June 2007 (CEST)
3 - 1.5, I'll put it back. Zojj 09:44, 2 June 2007 (CEST)
See Image:toc comparison.png to see what the above looks like here. I have come up with a compromise so that the indentation is done properly (lines spanning more than one line don't have the 2nd line messed up, here it is: —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bruce98 (talkcontribs).
I don't see the difference, but I also don't mind anymore either. =) Zojj 05:43, 27 September 2007 (CEST)


Anyone finds a way to insert this template into Cargo? It breaks the layout right now .-( -- 16:33, 2 November 2007 (CET)

The template {{-}} is the key. It includes some code that will "clear" any floating elements and make sure they don't overlap the content that follows. It's in use on a number of other pages where floated screenshots are longer than the section they're in and so would normally overlap the following section. Mintra 17:11, 2 November 2007 (CET)

What About

What about adding Tunnels and Bridges to the manual. Also this may be confusing we have a tutorial to show how to build things and some of the getting started things, so do we really have to cover the basics in each one of these pages in the manual. eg, roadways has on it how to build a roadway? Kyleg1 06:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Basics section

Why the most basic topics are not included in the structure? I'd rather see these above the "Infrastructure" section: Companies - Cargo - Agents - Stations - Catchment area - Delivery

Personal tools